首页> 外文OA文献 >Development, validation and evaluation of a rapid PCR-nucleic acid lateral flow immuno-assay for the detection of Plasmodium and the differentiation between Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax.
【2h】

Development, validation and evaluation of a rapid PCR-nucleic acid lateral flow immuno-assay for the detection of Plasmodium and the differentiation between Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax.

机译:用于疟原虫的检测以及恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫之间的区分的快速PCR-核酸侧流免疫测定的开发,验证和评估。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Molecular tools are very sensitive and specific and could be an alternative for the diagnosis of malaria. The complexity and need for expensive equipment may hamper implementation and, therefore, simplifications to current protocols are warranted. METHODS: A PCR detecting the different Plasmodium species and differentiating between Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax was developed and combined with a nucleic acid lateral flow immuno-assay (PCR-NALFIA) for amplicon detection. The assay was thoroughly evaluated for the analytical sensitivity and specificity in the laboratory, the robustness and reproducibility in a ring trial and accuracy and predictive value in a field trial. RESULTS: The analytical sensitivity and specificity were 0.978 (95% CI: 0.932-0.994) and 0.980 (95% CI: 0.924-0.997), respectively, and were slightly less sensitive for the detection of P. vivax than for P. falciparum. The reproducibility tested in three laboratories was very good (k = 0.83). This evaluation showed that the PCR machine used could influence the results. Accuracy was evaluated in Thailand and compared to expert microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). The overall and P. falciparum-specific sensitivity and specificity was good ranging from 0.86-1 and 0.95-0.98 respectively, compared to microscopy. Plasmodium vivax detection was better than the sensitivity of RDT, but slightly less than microscopy performed in this study. CONCLUSION: PCR-NALFIA is a sensitive, specific and robust assay able to identify Plasmodium species with good accuracy. Extensive testing including a ring trial can identify possible bottlenecks before implementation and is therefore essential to perform in additon to other evaluations.
机译:背景:分子工具非常敏感且具有特异性,可以作为疟疾诊断的替代方法。复杂性和对昂贵设备的需求可能会妨碍实施,因此,有必要简化当前协议。方法:开发了一种检测不同疟原虫种类并区分恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫的PCR,并将其与核酸横向流免疫分析(PCR-NALFIA)结合用于扩增子检测。在实验室中彻底评估了该测定法的分析敏感性和特异性,在环试验中的稳健性和可重复性以及在野外试验中的准确性和预测价值。结果:分析灵敏度和特异性分别为0.978(95%CI:0.932-0.994)和0.980(95%CI:0.924-0.997),并且对间日疟原虫的检测灵敏度略低于恶性疟原虫。在三个实验室中测试的重现性非常好(k = 0.83)。该评估表明所用的PCR机可能会影响结果。在泰国评估了准确性,并将其与专家显微镜和快速诊断测试(RDT)进行了比较。与显微镜相比,整体和恶性疟原虫的特异性敏感性和特异性分别为0.86-1和0.95-0.98。疟原虫间质检测优于RDT的灵敏度,但略低于本研究中进行的显微镜检查。结论:PCR-NALFIA是一种灵敏,特异且稳定的测定方法,能够准确鉴定疟原虫种类。广泛的测试(包括环形测试)可以在实施之前识别出可能的瓶颈,因此,除了进行其他评估之外,执行其他测试也至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号